Two Different Companies: The Convergence of Pharma and Wellness
The first time I walked into Allergan’s offices, I was struck by how different it felt from Takeda, the pharmaceutical company where I’d worked after graduating. Takeda felt like pharma: Clinical. Methodical. Allergan Aesthetics felt like a beauty company that happened to make medicines.
Working on Juvederm and Botox taught me a vital lesson: consumer desire drives demand even for medical products requiring HCP expertise. The HCP’s role shifted from prescriber to validator. That was 2012. We were right about the direction, but we underestimated the scale.
What GLP-1s Confirmed About Consumer Demand
I’ve worked on GLP-1 strategy, and the pattern is familiar, but the scale has upended the rules of pricing and distribution. Unpaid celebrity endorsements triggered unprecedented demand, leading to global shortages through 2023 and 2024.
This “Hollywood craze” created a grey market. At peak, 83% of compounded GLP-1 prescriptions were for weight loss rather than diabetes. Consumers are now researching, demanding, and finding alternatives when the system fails to meet their needs.
The Rise of the “Pharma-Beauty” Era
Consumers now have more access to health data than ever before. 42% search for health information weekly, and one in three Americans owns a wearable. Terms like “VO2 max” and “insulin sensitivity” have moved from textbooks to dinner table conversation.
This has led to a fascinating convergence:
- Pharma is becoming consumer-centric: Launching direct platforms like LillyDirect and NovoCare.
- Wellness is becoming clinical: Brands like Vida Glow and OneSkin are investing millions in randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
The Translation Gap: Science vs. Social Media
The problem lies in how people learn. 46% of consumers have abandoned a health product due to insufficient evidence. However, regulatory paradoxes often leave a vacuum that is filled by unregulated influencers and anecdotes that sound like data.
“The evidence exists. The translation doesn’t.”
The Impact of Place: Why I Underestimated SDOH
Working with geomapping opened my eyes to the role of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). These factors account for 60-80% of health outcomes. A JAMA study found neighborhood factors explained 63% of variance in premature mortality.
Translation isn’t just about simplifying language; it’s about understanding context. A consumer’s health journey is shaped by where they live, what they can access, and the specific barriers of their urban or rural environment.
Conclusion: The Future of the Connected Health Journey
The brands that win will be those that view health as a single, connected journey—not fragmented across pharma, wellness, and beauty. By translating science into relevance grounded in hyperlocal context, brands can build a level of trust that no influencer can match.
Ben Randal leads strategy at Adelo, focusing on the intersection of geospatial intelligence and pharmaceutical strategy.
References
GLP-1 Market: IQVIA (2025). “Non-Traditional Channels: The Compounded GLP-1 Market.” | FDA (2025). “Concerns with Unapproved GLP-1 Drugs.”
Consumer Behaviour: Deloitte UK (2025). “Strategies to Impact Health Literacy.” | Rock Health (2024). “Patterns of Wearable Usage.”
Clinical Wellness: BeautyMatter (2025). “How Clinical-Grade Evidence Is Rewriting Beauty’s Playbook.”
SDOH: WHO & JAMA Network Open (2020). “Quantification of Neighborhood-Level Social Determinants of Health.”